How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HM75R vs UT6 MCT

Fenix HM75R vs Nitecore UT6 MCT

What HM75R does better (3) and where UT6 MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix HM75R
Fenix · 2024HM75R
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $170
vs
Nitecore UT6 MCT
Nitecore · 2026UT6 MCT
9.2Score
0 advantages≈ $125
Higher score
8.7Brightness & throw8.3
8.0Battery & charging5.5
4.5Build & durability9.4

Why is HM75R better than UT6 MCT?

  1. Maximum runtime234 h vs 31 h7.5×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)223 m vs 195 m+14%
  3. Peak beam intensity12,430 cd vs 9,510 cd+31%

Why is UT6 MCT better than HM75R?

UT6 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix HM75RFenix HM75R≈ $1707.9
Nitecore UT6 MCTNitecore UT6 MCT≈ $1259.2
Light output
Maximum output1,600 lm1,600 lm
Peak beam intensity12,430 cd9,510 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)223 m195 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs2—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Adjustable colour temperatureYes—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion—
Battery capacity—4,000 mAh
Maximum runtime234 h31 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Power bank functionYes—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)2 m2 m
Body material—Magnesium
Size & weight
Weight321 g—
Modes & features
SwitchRotary / scroll wheel—
Red lightYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare