- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HP30R V2.0 vs DUO RL
Fenix HP30R V2.0 vs Petzl DUO RL
What HP30R V2.0 does better (4) and where DUO RL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.2
7.4Battery & charging5.8
3.4Light quality5.7
Why is HP30R V2.0 better than DUO RL?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 72 h+67%
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 2,800 lm+7%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)270 m vs 255 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity18,220 cd vs 16,260 cd+12%
Why is DUO RL better than HP30R V2.0?
- Weight437 g vs 390 g+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,220 cd | 16,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 270 m | 255 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,080 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP50 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,550K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 72 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 4 h |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 92 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 56 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 437 g | 390 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
