- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HP35R SAR vs UT2000
Fenix HP35R SAR vs Nitecore UT2000
What HP35R SAR does better (2) and where UT2000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HP35R SAR better than UT2000?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)500 m vs 220 m2.3×
- Maximum output4,000 lm vs 2,000 lm2×
Why is UT2000 better than HP35R SAR?
UT2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 12,126 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 97 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 12,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 122 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
