How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HT32 vs MH40 Pro

Fenix HT32 vs Nitecore MH40 Pro

What HT32 does better (0) and where MH40 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Fenix HT32
Fenix · 2023HT32
7.2Score
0 advantages≈ $160
vs
Nitecore MH40 Pro
Nitecore · 2024MH40 Pro
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $170
Higher score
8.0Brightness & throw9.0
4.0Battery & charging8.0
6.2Build & durability4.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is HT32 better than MH40 Pro?

HT32 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is MH40 Pro better than HT32?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)640 m vs 1,300 m2×
  2. Peak beam intensity102,400 cd vs 422,500 cd4.1×
  3. Maximum runtime29 h vs 62 h2.1×
  4. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 3,500 lm+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix HT32Fenix HT32≈ $1607.2
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm3,500 lm
Peak beam intensity102,400 cd422,500 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)640 m1,300 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-70NiteLab UHi 40 MAX
LED makerLuminusNiteLab
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity—10,000 mAh
Maximum runtime29 h62 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)—1 m
Size & weight
Length / height160 mm—
Head diameter / width52 mm—
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm—
Weight185 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels—4
SwitchDual switchesRemote pressure switch
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
Red lightYes—
Green / blue / RGB lightYes—
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare