- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LD15R vs PD35 V2.0
Fenix LD15R vs Fenix PD35 V2.0
What LD15R does better (1) and where PD35 V2.0 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
LD15RPD35 V2.0
| LD15R | PD35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 70 mm | 138 mm | −68 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 25.4 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 88 g | −48 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LD15R better than PD35 V2.0?
- Weight40 g vs 88 g2.2×
Why is PD35 V2.0 better than LD15R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)85 m vs 250 m2.9×
- Maximum output500 lm vs 1,000 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity1,810 cd vs 15,620 cd8.6×
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 430 h3.9×
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,810 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 85 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G3 | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 430 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 70 mm | 138 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
