- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LD42 vs WT20R Adjustable Angle
Fenix LD42 vs Fenix WT20R Adjustable Angle
What LD42 does better (5) and where WT20R Adjustable Angle wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Brightness & throw2.5
9.2Build & durability5.7
7.9Light quality2.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is LD42 better than WT20R Adjustable Angle?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)350 m vs 117 m3×
- Peak beam intensity30,620 cd vs 3,420 cd9×
- Maximum runtime130.3 h vs 21 h6.2×
- Weight99 g vs 153 g+55%
- Brightness levels5 vs 3+67%
Why is WT20R Adjustable Angle better than LD42?
- Maximum output350 lm vs 400 lm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 350 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 30,620 cd | 3,420 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 350 m | 117 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA, AA |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 130.3 h | 21 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 32.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 99 g | 153 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 3 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Side switch |
