- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR35R vs UT90 Predator
Fenix LR35R vs Imalent UT90 Predator
What LR35R does better (2) and where UT90 Predator wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Brightness & throw9.2
6.7Battery & charging9.1
5.4Build & durability2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
LR35RUT90 Predator
| LR35R | UT90 Predator | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 66 mm | +74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 51.5 mm | 25.4 mm | +26.1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 46.5 mm | 24.5 mm | +22 mm |
| Weight | 238 g | 418 g | −180 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LR35R better than UT90 Predator?
- Maximum output10,000 lm vs 4,800 lm2.1×
- Weight238 g vs 418 g+76%
Why is UT90 Predator better than LR35R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)500 m vs 1,308 m2.6×
- Peak beam intensity62,500 cd vs 427,980 cd6.8×
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 100 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 10,000 lm | 4,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 62,500 cd | 427,980 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | 1,308 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SBT-90 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 8,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 66 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 51.5 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 46.5 mm | 24.5 mm |
| Weight | 238 g | 418 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | — | Dual switches, Remote pressure switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
