- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR40R vs UT90 Predator
Fenix LR40R vs Imalent UT90 Predator
What LR40R does better (1) and where UT90 Predator wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Brightness & throw9.2
7.6Battery & charging9.1
2.5Build & durability2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
LR40RUT90 Predator
| LR40R | UT90 Predator | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 66 mm | +88 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 80 mm | 25.4 mm | +54.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | 24.5 mm | +26.5 mm |
| Weight | 499 g | 418 g | +81 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LR40R better than UT90 Predator?
- Maximum output12,000 lm vs 4,800 lm2.5×
Why is UT90 Predator better than LR40R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)640 m vs 1,308 m2×
- Peak beam intensity102,400 cd vs 427,980 cd4.2×
- Weight499 g vs 418 g+19%
- Maximum runtime92.3 h vs 100 h+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 12,000 lm | 4,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 102,400 cd | 427,980 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 640 m | 1,308 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 198 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SBT-90 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 8,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 92.3 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 66 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 80 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | 24.5 mm |
| Weight | 499 g | 418 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches, Remote pressure switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
