- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 TAC vs PD35 V3.0
Fenix PD35 TAC vs Fenix PD35 V3.0
What PD35 TAC does better (0) and where PD35 V3.0 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 TACPD35 V3.0
| PD35 TAC | PD35 V3.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 137 mm | 134 mm | +3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 TAC better than PD35 V3.0?
PD35 TAC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than PD35 TAC?
- Peak beam intensity10,000 cd vs 31,860 cd3.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 357 m+78%
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,700 lm+70%
- Maximum runtime140 h vs 230 h+64%
- Weight88 g vs 84 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,000 cd | 31,860 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 200 m | 357 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 140 h | 230 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137 mm | 134 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 22.8 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
