- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 TAC vs UC35 V2.0
Fenix PD35 TAC vs Fenix UC35 V2.0
What PD35 TAC does better (0) and where UC35 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 TACUC35 V2.0
| PD35 TAC | UC35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 137 mm | 140 mm | −3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 TAC better than UC35 V2.0?
PD35 TAC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than PD35 TAC?
- Maximum runtime140 h vs 750 h5.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 266 m+33%
- Peak beam intensity10,000 cd vs 17,690 cd+77%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,000 cd | 17,690 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 200 m | 266 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 140 h | 750 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
