How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. PD35 TAC vs E12R

Fenix PD35 TAC vs Wuben E12R

What PD35 TAC does better (3) and where E12R wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix PD35 TAC
Fenix · 2018PD35 TAC
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Wuben E12R
Wuben · 2020E12R
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $60
3.5Brightness & throw3.4
9.4Battery & charging8.1
9.6Build & durability9.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is PD35 TAC better than E12R?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 179 m+12%
  2. Peak beam intensity10,000 cd vs 8,010 cd+25%
  3. Weight88 g vs 92 g+5%

Why is E12R better than PD35 TAC?

  1. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+20%
  2. Maximum runtime140 h vs 173 h+24%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix PD35 TACFenix PD35 TAC≈ $708.1
Wuben E12RWuben E12R≈ $606.7
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm1,200 lm
Peak beam intensity10,000 cd8,010 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m179 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-LOsram P9
LED makerCreeOsram
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, CR123A18650 Li-ion
Battery capacity—3,400 mAh
Maximum runtime140 h173 h
RechargeableYesYes
Power bank function—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height137 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Weight88 g92 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare