- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs TK11 TAC
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Fenix TK11 TAC
What PD35 V3.0 does better (6) and where TK11 TAC wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V3.0TK11 TAC
| PD35 V3.0 | TK11 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 134 mm | 140 mm | −6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 34 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | 23.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 114 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 47.5 h4.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 335 m+7%
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,600 lm+6%
- Weight84 g vs 114 g+36%
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 28,060 cd+14%
- Brightness levels5 vs 3+67%
Why is TK11 TAC better than PD35 V3.0?
TK11 TAC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 28,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 335 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 47.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 114 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 3 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
