- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs TK16 V2.0
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Fenix TK16 V2.0
What PD35 V3.0 does better (2) and where TK16 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V3.0TK16 V2.0
| PD35 V3.0 | TK16 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 134 mm | 143 mm | −9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 34 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | 25.4 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 112 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than TK16 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 43.3 h5.3×
- Weight84 g vs 112 g+33%
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than PD35 V3.0?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 3,100 lm+82%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 380 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 36,100 cd+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 36,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 380 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 6,200K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 43.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | 143 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
