- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs MH11
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Nitecore MH11
What PD35 V3.0 does better (3) and where MH11 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than MH11?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 189 m+89%
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 8,930 cd3.6×
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,000 lm+70%
Why is MH11 better than PD35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 250 h+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 8,930 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 189 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 250 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
