- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs MH25 V2
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Nitecore MH25 V2
What PD35 V3.0 does better (1) and where MH25 V2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than MH25 V2?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,300 lm+31%
Why is MH25 V2 better than PD35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 1,500 h6.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 475 m+33%
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 56,410 cd+77%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 56,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
