- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs Freyr
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Olight Freyr
What PD35 V3.0 does better (0) and where Freyr wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V3.0Freyr
| PD35 V3.0 | Freyr | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 134 mm | 136 mm | −2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm | −14.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than Freyr?
PD35 V3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Freyr better than PD35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 360 h+57%
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,750 lm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 360 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 360 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
