- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs Angel Eyes E200
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What PD35 V3.0 does better (4) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Brightness & throw3.4
8.7Battery & charging5.4
8.9Build & durability7.8
7.9Light quality4.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 118 m3×
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 3,480 cd9.2×
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,650 lm+3%
- Brightness levels5 vs 4+25%
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than PD35 V3.0?
Angel Eyes E200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 47 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
