How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. PD35 V3.0 vs C2

Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Wuben C2

What PD35 V3.0 does better (0) and where C2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix PD35 V3.0
Fenix · 2021PD35 V3.0
8.8Score
0 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Wuben C2
Wuben · 2021C2
8.3Score
1 advantage≈ $40
5.8Brightness & throw6.1
8.9Build & durability7.8

Why is PD35 V3.0 better than C2?

PD35 V3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is C2 better than PD35 V3.0?

  1. Maximum output1,700 lm vs 2,000 lm+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix PD35 V3.0Fenix PD35 V3.0≈ $758.8
Wuben C2Wuben C2≈ $408.3
Light output
Maximum output1,700 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity31,860 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs1—
Colour temperature6,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, CR123A—
Maximum runtime230 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Power bank function—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Body materialAluminium—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height134 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth22.8 mm—
Weight84 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare