- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V3.0 vs E12R
Fenix PD35 V3.0 vs Wuben E12R
What PD35 V3.0 does better (5) and where E12R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than E12R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)357 m vs 179 m+99%
- Peak beam intensity31,860 cd vs 8,010 cd4×
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,200 lm+42%
- Maximum runtime230 h vs 173 h+33%
- Weight84 g vs 92 g+10%
Why is E12R better than PD35 V3.0?
E12R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,860 cd | 8,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 357 m | 179 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Osram P9 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 230 h | 173 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 134 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 84 g | 92 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
