- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35R ACE vs C61
Fenix PD35R ACE vs Nextorch C61
What PD35R ACE does better (3) and where C61 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35R ACEC61
| PD35R ACE | C61 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140.5 mm | 165 mm | −24.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 35 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.6 mm | 28.5 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Weight | 145 g | 175 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35R ACE better than C61?
- Maximum runtime720 h vs 500 h+44%
- Weight145 g vs 175 g+21%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is C61 better than PD35R ACE?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+75%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 720 h | 500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | 1 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140.5 mm | 165 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 35 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.6 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Weight | 145 g | 175 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
