- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35R vs TK22 V2.0
Fenix PD35R vs Fenix TK22 V2.0
What PD35R does better (3) and where TK22 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35RTK22 V2.0
| PD35R | TK22 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136 mm | 150 mm | −14 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm | −14.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.2 mm | 25.4 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 150 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35R better than TK22 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,600 lm+6%
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 80 h+25%
- Weight140 g vs 150 g+7%
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than PD35R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)353 m vs 405 m+15%
- Peak beam intensity31,150 cd vs 41,010 cd+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,150 cd | 41,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 353 m | 405 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.2 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
