- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35R vs E52D
Fenix PD35R vs Nextorch E52D
What PD35R does better (3) and where E52D wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35RE52D
| PD35R | E52D | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136 mm | 153 mm | −17 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 30 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 130 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35R better than E52D?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)353 m vs 280 m+26%
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 60 h+67%
- Peak beam intensity31,150 cd vs 19,600 cd+59%
Why is E52D better than PD35R?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 3,700 lm2.2×
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+41%
- Weight140 g vs 130 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,150 cd | 19,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 353 m | 280 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.2 mm | — |
| Weight | 140 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
