- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35R vs MH25 V2.0
Fenix PD35R vs Nitecore MH25 V2.0
What PD35R does better (2) and where MH25 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35RMH25 V2.0
| PD35R | MH25 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136 mm | 157 mm | −21 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm | −14.6 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 137 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35R better than MH25 V2.0?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,300 lm+31%
Why is MH25 V2.0 better than PD35R?
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 1,500 h15×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)353 m vs 475 m+35%
- Weight140 g vs 137 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 31,150 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 353 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Cree XM-L |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136 mm | 157 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.2 mm | — |
| Weight | 140 g | 137 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
