- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36R PRO vs TK22 TAC
Fenix PD36R PRO vs Fenix TK22 TAC
What PD36R PRO does better (0) and where TK22 TAC wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD36R PROTK22 TAC
| PD36R PRO | TK22 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 145.8 mm | 154 mm | −8.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 40 mm | −13.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.7 mm | 26 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 156 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD36R PRO better than TK22 TAC?
PD36R PRO has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TK22 TAC better than PD36R PRO?
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 72,900 cd2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 540 m+42%
- Maximum runtime42 h vs 49.5 h+18%
- Weight169 g vs 156 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 540 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 42 h | 49.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 145.8 mm | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 156 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
