- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD40R V2.0 vs TK35UE V2.0
Fenix PD40R V2.0 vs Fenix TK35UE V2.0
What PD40R V2.0 does better (3) and where TK35UE V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Brightness & throw7.6
7.2Battery & charging7.2
8.3Build & durability6.0
3.5Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD40R V2.0TK35UE V2.0
| PD40R V2.0 | TK35UE V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 143 mm | −5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33.2 mm | 43 mm | −9.8 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 202 g | −86 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD40R V2.0 better than TK35UE V2.0?
- Weight116 g vs 202 g+74%
- Maximum runtime88.2 h vs 85 h+4%
- Peak beam intensity41,010 cd vs 40,000 cd+3%
Why is TK35UE V2.0 better than PD40R V2.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 5,000 lm+67%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 40,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,400K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 88.2 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 143 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33.2 mm | 43 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 116 g | 202 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
