- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD40R V3.0 vs TK22 TAC
Fenix PD40R V3.0 vs Fenix TK22 TAC
What PD40R V3.0 does better (2) and where TK22 TAC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw7.9
7.3Battery & charging4.9
6.1Build & durability6.4
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD40R V3.0TK22 TAC
| PD40R V3.0 | TK22 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 154 mm | −11 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm | −6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 26 mm | = |
| Weight | 198 g | 156 g | +42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD40R V3.0 better than TK22 TAC?
- Maximum runtime89 h vs 49.5 h+80%
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 2,800 lm+7%
Why is TK22 TAC better than PD40R V3.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)500 m vs 540 m+8%
- Weight198 g vs 156 g+27%
- Peak beam intensity62,500 cd vs 72,900 cd+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 62,500 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | 540 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 89 h | 49.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 156 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
