- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD40R V3.0 vs TK22R
Fenix PD40R V3.0 vs Fenix TK22R
What PD40R V3.0 does better (4) and where TK22R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw7.7
7.3Battery & charging5.0
6.1Build & durability5.6
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD40R V3.0TK22R
| PD40R V3.0 | TK22R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 158 mm | −15 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm | −6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 25.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 218 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD40R V3.0 better than TK22R?
- Maximum runtime89 h vs 50 h+78%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)500 m vs 480 m+4%
- Weight198 g vs 218 g+10%
- Peak beam intensity62,500 cd vs 57,600 cd+9%
Why is TK22R better than PD40R V3.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,200 lm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 62,500 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 89 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 218 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
