- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- R35R vs UT90 Predator
Fenix R35R vs Imalent UT90 Predator
What R35R does better (2) and where UT90 Predator wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw9.4
8.8Battery & charging9.2
3.4Build & durability3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
R35RUT90 Predator
| R35R | UT90 Predator | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 66 mm | +74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 51 mm | 25.4 mm | +25.6 mm |
| Weight | 339 g | 418 g | −79 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is R35R better than UT90 Predator?
- Battery capacity21,700 mAh vs 8,000 mAh2.7×
- Weight339 g vs 418 g+23%
Why is UT90 Predator better than R35R?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 4,800 lm4.8×
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 100 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 4,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 427,980 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 1,308 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SBT-90 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Battery capacity | 21,700 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 66 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 51 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 24.5 mm |
| Weight | 339 g | 418 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches, Remote pressure switch |
| Colours | Black | — |
