- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK17 vs TK25R
Fenix TK17 vs Fenix TK25R
What TK17 does better (2) and where TK25R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK17TK25R
| TK17 | TK25R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 148.5 mm | 164 mm | −15.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 36 mm | 36 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26.2 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 225 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK17 better than TK25R?
- Weight197 g vs 225 g+14%
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 55 h+9%
Why is TK25R better than TK17?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)330 m vs 350 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity27,220 cd vs 30,620 cd+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,600 lm | 3,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 27,220 cd | 30,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 330 m | 350 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP50 | Cree XHP50 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 36 mm | 36 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26.2 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 225 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
