- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK17 vs Davinci 8000
Fenix TK17 vs NEBO Davinci 8000
What TK17 does better (4) and where Davinci 8000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Brightness & throw7.0
7.4Battery & charging4.8
6.2Build & durability2.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is TK17 better than Davinci 8000?
- Weight197 g vs 527 g2.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)330 m vs 206 m+60%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 45 h+33%
Why is Davinci 8000 better than TK17?
- Maximum output3,600 lm vs 8,000 lm2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,600 lm | 8,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 27,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 330 m | 206 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP50 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 36 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 197 g | 527 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
