- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK17 vs EDC27 UHI
Fenix TK17 vs Nitecore EDC27 UHI
What TK17 does better (7) and where EDC27 UHI wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK17 better than EDC27 UHI?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh3.5×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Maximum output3,600 lm vs 3,100 lm+16%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)330 m vs 304 m+9%
- RechargeableYes · EDC27 UHI: No
- Peak beam intensity27,220 cd vs 23,100 cd+18%
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 55 h+9%
Why is EDC27 UHI better than TK17?
EDC27 UHI has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,600 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 27,220 cd | 23,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 330 m | 304 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP50 | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 20 |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | 3,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 1,700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 36 mm | 27 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 197 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
