How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK20R V2.0 vs TA30C

Fenix TK20R V2.0 vs Nextorch TA30C

What TK20R V2.0 does better (3) and where TA30C wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK20R V2.0
Fenix · 2022TK20R V2.0
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
vs
Nextorch TA30C
Nextorch · 2022TA30C
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $120
7.5Brightness & throw5.2
5.6Battery & charging4.4
5.9Build & durability9.1
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

TK20R V2.0TA30C
34 × 15325.430 × 13623
TK20R V2.0TA30CDifference
Length / height153 mm136 mm+17 mm
Head diameter / width34 mm30 mm+4 mm
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm23 mm+2.4 mm
Weight204 g97 g+107 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TK20R V2.0 better than TA30C?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+88%
  2. Peak beam intensity56,410 cd vs 22,950 cd2.5×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)475 m vs 303 m+57%

Why is TA30C better than TK20R V2.0?

  1. Weight204 g vs 97 g2.1×
  2. Maximum runtime48 h vs 50 h+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK20R V2.0Fenix TK20R V2.0≈ $1307.9
Nextorch TA30CNextorch TA30C≈ $1206.6
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm1,600 lm
Peak beam intensity56,410 cd22,950 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)475 m303 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Number of batteries1—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime48 h50 h
RechargeableYes—
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IPX8
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height153 mm136 mm
Head diameter / width34 mm30 mm
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm23 mm
Weight204 g97 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switchesTail switch
StrobeYesYes
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare