- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK20R V2.0 vs TA30C Max
Fenix TK20R V2.0 vs Nextorch TA30C Max
What TK20R V2.0 does better (1) and where TA30C Max wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Brightness & throw7.0
5.6Battery & charging7.3
5.9Build & durability7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK20R V2.0TA30C Max
| TK20R V2.0 | TA30C Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 153 mm | 153 mm | = |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 38 mm | −4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK20R V2.0 better than TA30C Max?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)475 m vs 390 m+22%
Why is TA30C Max better than TK20R V2.0?
TA30C Max has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 56,410 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 475 m | 390 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 48 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 204 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
