- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22R vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Fenix TK22R vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What TK22R does better (3) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw8.0
Why is TK22R better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 400 m+20%
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 3,100 lm+3%
- RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than TK22R?
Seeker 4 IPX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 158 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 218 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
