- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22R vs Warrior Mini 3
Fenix TK22R vs Olight Warrior Mini 3
What TK22R does better (3) and where Warrior Mini 3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Brightness & throw5.8
5.8Build & durability2.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is TK22R better than Warrior Mini 3?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 240 m2×
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 1,750 lm+83%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is Warrior Mini 3 better than TK22R?
Warrior Mini 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 158 mm | 111 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 218 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
