- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK25 UV vs UC35 V2.0
Fenix TK25 UV vs Fenix UC35 V2.0
What TK25 UV does better (0) and where UC35 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK25 UVUC35 V2.0
| TK25 UV | UC35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 142.6 mm | 140 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 88 g | +68 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK25 UV better than UC35 V2.0?
TK25 UV has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than TK25 UV?
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 750 h6.8×
- Weight156 g vs 88 g+77%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)225 m vs 266 m+18%
- Peak beam intensity12,660 cd vs 17,690 cd+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,660 cd | 17,690 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 225 m | 266 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 750 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 142.6 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
