- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK26R vs TK72R
Fenix TK26R vs Fenix TK72R
What TK26R does better (5) and where TK72R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK26RTK72R
| TK26R | TK72R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 156 mm | −6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 59 mm | −19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 50 mm | −24.6 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 411 g | −255 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK26R better than TK72R?
- Weight156 g vs 411 g2.6×
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 50 h2×
- USB-C chargingYes · TK72R: No
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)350 m vs 286 m+22%
- Peak beam intensity30,620 cd vs 20,450 cd+50%
Why is TK72R better than TK26R?
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 9,000 lm6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 9,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 30,620 cd | 20,450 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 350 m | 286 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 7,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 156 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 59 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 50 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 411 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
