- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs R90C
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Imalent R90C
What TK35UE Fenix does better (2) and where R90C wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw9.6
9.0Battery & charging3.7
3.0Build & durability3.8
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than R90C?
- Maximum runtime152 h vs 26 h5.8×
- Weight286 g vs 1,250 g4.4×
Why is R90C better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 20,000 lm6.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 1,679 m5.6×
- Peak beam intensity22,500 cd vs 704,900 cd31.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 20,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | 704,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 1,679 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 9 |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | 26 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 286 g | 1,250 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
