- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE V2.0 vs UC52
Fenix TK35UE V2.0 vs Fenix UC52
What TK35UE V2.0 does better (5) and where UC52 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Brightness & throw5.6
7.2Battery & charging4.3
6.0Build & durability5.0
7.9Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE V2.0UC52
| TK35UE V2.0 | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 153.5 mm | −10.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 42 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 275 g | −73 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE V2.0 better than UC52?
- Peak beam intensity40,000 cd vs 16,000 cd2.5×
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 3,100 lm+61%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)400 m vs 253 m+58%
- Weight202 g vs 275 g+36%
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 82.5 h+3%
Why is UC52 better than TK35UE V2.0?
UC52 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 40,000 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 400 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 26 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
