How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. UC35 V2.0 vs ML300L 4D

Fenix UC35 V2.0 vs Maglite ML300L 4D

What UC35 V2.0 does better (2) and where ML300L 4D wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix UC35 V2.0
Fenix · 2018UC35 V2.0
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ $90
vs
Maglite ML300L 4D
Maglite · 2020ML300L 4D
7.7Score
0 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
5.3Brightness & throw5.4
6.2Battery & charging9.1

Why is UC35 V2.0 better than ML300L 4D?

  1. Maximum runtime750 h vs 434 h+73%
  2. RechargeableYes · ML300L 4D: No

Why is ML300L 4D better than UC35 V2.0?

ML300L 4D has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix UC35 V2.0Fenix UC35 V2.0≈ $907.2
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm1,002 lm
Peak beam intensity17,690 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)266 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HI—
LED makerCree—
Colour temperature5,700K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA—
Battery capacity3,400 mAh—
Maximum runtime750 h434 h
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingNo—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height140 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth23.5 mm—
Weight88 g—
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare