- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC35 V2.0 vs MH12 V2.0
Fenix UC35 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH12 V2.0
What UC35 V2.0 does better (1) and where MH12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
UC35 V2.0MH12 V2.0
| UC35 V2.0 | MH12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 158 mm | −18 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than MH12 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)266 m vs 202 m+32%
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than UC35 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime750 h vs 1,500 h2×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+20%
- Weight88 g vs 84 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 17,690 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 266 m | 202 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 750 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
