How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. UC35 V2.0 vs Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle

Fenix UC35 V2.0 vs Olight Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle

What UC35 V2.0 does better (1) and where Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix UC35 V2.0
Fenix · 2018UC35 V2.0
7.2Score
1 advantage≈ $90
vs
Olight Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle
7.5Score
0 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
5.3Brightness & throw5.0
8.8Build & durability9.4
5.9Features5.9

Why is UC35 V2.0 better than Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle?

  1. RechargeableYes · Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle: No

Why is Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle better than UC35 V2.0?

Arkfeld duale Lichtquelle has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix UC35 V2.0Fenix UC35 V2.0≈ $907.2
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm1,000 lm
Peak beam intensity17,690 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)266 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HI—
LED makerCree—
Colour temperature5,700K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA—
Battery capacity3,400 mAh—
Maximum runtime750 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingNo—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height140 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth23.5 mm—
Weight88 g87 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare