- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WH23R vs oStar
Fenix WH23R vs Nextorch oStar
What WH23R does better (3) and where oStar wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WH23RoStar
| WH23R | oStar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 86.4 mm | 78 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 65 mm | −20 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43.7 mm | 46 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Weight | 115 g | 87 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WH23R better than oStar?
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 60 h2.5×
- Maximum output600 lm vs 500 lm+20%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
Why is oStar better than WH23R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 131 m+31%
- Peak beam intensity2,500 cd vs 4,290 cd+72%
- Weight115 g vs 87 g+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,500 cd | 4,290 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 131 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 65 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43.7 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 115 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
