- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R Adjustable Head vs MH12 V2.0
Fenix WT25R Adjustable Head vs Nitecore MH12 V2.0
What WT25R Adjustable Head does better (1) and where MH12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Brightness & throw5.2
4.6Battery & charging9.8
7.0Build & durability9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25R Adjustable HeadMH12 V2.0
| WT25R Adjustable Head | MH12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 158 mm | −22.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 25 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 84 g | +53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R Adjustable Head better than MH12 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 202 m+9%
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than WT25R Adjustable Head?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 1,500 h51.7×
- Weight137 g vs 84 g+63%
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 202 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,550K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
