- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs ML300L 3 D-Cell
Fenix WT25R vs Maglite ML300L 3 D-Cell
What WT25R does better (2) and where ML300L 3 D-Cell wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Brightness & throw5.0
3.4Build & durability2.4
Why is WT25R better than ML300L 3 D-Cell?
- Weight137 g vs 748 g5.5×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 625 lm+60%
Why is ML300L 3 D-Cell better than WT25R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 406 m+85%
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 117 h4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 625 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 406 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | D |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 117 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 295 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | 748 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
