How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WT26RM vs X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet

Fenix WT26RM vs Philips X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet

What WT26RM does better (2) and where X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WT26RM
Fenix · 2026WT26RM
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $90
vs
Philips X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet
9.6Score
1 advantage≈ $80
Higher score
8.1Brightness & throw7.8
6.6Build & durability7.8

Why is WT26RM better than X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 1,200 lm2.1×
  2. RechargeableYes · X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet: No

Why is X30BONNX1 Xperion 3000 Bonnet better than WT26RM?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix WT26RMFenix WT26RM≈ $908.4
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm1,200 lm
Peak beam intensity32,760 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)362 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—10
Colour temperature6,500K3,000K
Adjustable colour temperatureYes—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime69.3 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66—
Water protection (IPx)IPx6IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height122 mm—
Head diameter / width56 mm54 mm
Body diameter / depth40 mm—
Weight241 g—
Modes & features
SwitchRotary / scroll wheel—
Red lightYes—
Green / blue / RGB light—Yes
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Green
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare