How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,201 models · updated Oct 26, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WT26RM vs X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid

Fenix WT26RM vs Philips X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid

What WT26RM does better (1) and where X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WT26RM
Fenix · 2026WT26RM
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Philips X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid
7.2Score
1 advantage≈ $120
8.8Battery & charging9.4
7.2Build & durability3.9

Why is WT26RM better than X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%

Why is X61BONNX1 Xperion 6100 Bonnet Hybrid better than WT26RM?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix WT26RMFenix WT26RM≈ $908.6
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm—
Peak beam intensity32,760 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)362 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Colour temperature6,500K6,500K
Adjustable colour temperatureYes—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh
Maximum runtime69.3 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Charging time—2.5 h
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66—
Water protection (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height122 mm—
Head diameter / width56 mm—
Body diameter / depth40 mm—
Weight241 g—
Modes & features
SwitchRotary / scroll wheel—
Red lightYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Green
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare