How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,201 models · updated Oct 26, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WT26RM vs 149010

Fenix WT26RM vs XCell 149010

What WT26RM does better (1) and where 149010 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WT26RM
Fenix · 2026WT26RM
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
vs
XCell 149010
XCell · 2024149010
1 advantage≈ $100
8.3Brightness & throw9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

WT26RM149010
56 × 1224054 × 340
WT26RM149010Difference
Length / height122 mm340 mm−218 mm
Head diameter / width56 mm54 mm+2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WT26RM better than 149010?

  1. RechargeableYes · 149010: No

Why is 149010 better than WT26RM?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 10,000 lm4×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix WT26RMFenix WT26RM≈ $908.6
XCell 149010XCell 149010≈ $100
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm10,000 lm
Peak beam intensity32,760 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)362 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—18
Colour temperature6,500K—
Adjustable colour temperatureYes—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime69.3 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66—
Water protection (IPx)IPx6—
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height122 mm340 mm
Head diameter / width56 mm54 mm
Body diameter / depth40 mm—
Weight241 g—
Modes & features
SwitchRotary / scroll wheel—
Red lightYes—
Green / blue / RGB light—Yes
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare