How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0 vs EDC35

Flex-Tools Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0 vs Nitecore EDC35

What Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0 does better (1) and where EDC35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Flex-Tools Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0
Flex-Tools · 2022Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0
5.0Score
1 advantage≈ $95
vs
Nitecore EDC35
Nitecore · 2024EDC35
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
8.4Brightness & throw8.8
2.0Build & durability8.9

Why is Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0 better than EDC35?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)630 m vs 550 m+15%

Why is EDC35 better than Akku-Flutlicht WL 2800 18.0?

  1. Maximum output2,800 lm vs 5,000 lm+79%
Specifications

Side by side

Nitecore EDC35Nitecore EDC35≈ $909.4
Light output
Maximum output2,800 lm5,000 lm
Peak beam intensity—75,620 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)630 m550 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—NiteLab UHi 40 MAX
LED maker—NiteLab
Number of LEDs72
Colour temperature—6,000K
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity—6,000 mAh
Maximum runtime—90 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—3 h
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Body material—Aluminium
Pocket clip—Yes
Can tail-stand—Yes
Size & weight
Head diameter / width—68 mm
Weight1,000 g—
Modes & features
Switch—Tail switch
Lockout—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare