- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- CH35 vs TUP
GP CH35 vs Nitecore TUP
What CH35 does better (0) and where TUP wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is CH35 better than TUP?
CH35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TUP better than CH35?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 1,000 lm+67%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)130 m vs 180 m+38%
- Maximum runtime60 h vs 70 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 130 m | 180 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 60 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 71 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | — | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Green | — |
